<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photosimile 5000 &#8211; The World&#8217;s First Office Photography Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://currentphotographer.com/photosimile-5000-the-worlds-first-office-photography-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://currentphotographer.com/photosimile-5000-the-worlds-first-office-photography-machine/</link>
	<description>The latest digital photography news, tips, tools, techniques, how-tos and reviews for beginners through professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Current</title>
		<link>http://currentphotographer.com/photosimile-5000-the-worlds-first-office-photography-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Current</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentphotographer.com/?p=1205#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Hey Von, thanks for your kind words and I&#039;m glad you&#039;re enjoying the news segments.

There are a lot of table top studio setups out there, I&#039;ve even tried a few myself. Ultimately I ended up going back to a traditional table top setup because of the flexibility of lighting and the floor space required for a permanent setup.

The Photosimile 5000 is not for everyone. A pro photographer can easily setup a table top with a backdrop, lights, reflectors and fire off a few shots in a matter of minutes. I think the ideal candidate for this type of product is a company that&#039;s hiring outside photographers to do simple &quot;shadowless&quot; product shots for catalog work. In the long run they would probably save money purchasing this equipment and having an intern run it.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I don&#039;t want to see photographers lose work to a piece of equipment, but on the other hand, how much profit would you really be making doing the type of photography that this machine was intended for? In today&#039;s economy it&#039;s all about the bottom line, why spend more on the outside if you can do it in house cheaper. Personally I would rather focus my photography efforts on more lucrative projects and let someone or something else take care of the mechanical stuff.

Trevor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Von, thanks for your kind words and I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re enjoying the news segments.</p>
<p>There are a lot of table top studio setups out there, I&#8217;ve even tried a few myself. Ultimately I ended up going back to a traditional table top setup because of the flexibility of lighting and the floor space required for a permanent setup.</p>
<p>The Photosimile 5000 is not for everyone. A pro photographer can easily setup a table top with a backdrop, lights, reflectors and fire off a few shots in a matter of minutes. I think the ideal candidate for this type of product is a company that&#8217;s hiring outside photographers to do simple &#8220;shadowless&#8221; product shots for catalog work. In the long run they would probably save money purchasing this equipment and having an intern run it.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I don&#8217;t want to see photographers lose work to a piece of equipment, but on the other hand, how much profit would you really be making doing the type of photography that this machine was intended for? In today&#8217;s economy it&#8217;s all about the bottom line, why spend more on the outside if you can do it in house cheaper. Personally I would rather focus my photography efforts on more lucrative projects and let someone or something else take care of the mechanical stuff.</p>
<p>Trevor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von R Buzard</title>
		<link>http://currentphotographer.com/photosimile-5000-the-worlds-first-office-photography-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Von R Buzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentphotographer.com/?p=1205#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Hello Trevor
Let me start by saying that it&#039;s been great listening to you on the New Media Photographer podcast

I know they are billing this Photographer-in-a-Box systems like as a first of it.s kind but these have bee around for some time now. Although this one does have a turntable.

These are good when an exec needs to show a damaged bolt or something to a supplier half way across the planet but other then that they are quite useless. The shooting area is WAY to small for anything much bigger then a pack of smokes.

I also like how they don&#039;t list how much it costs. I would render to guess it goes for anywhere from $2,000 to $4,000

I&#039;m sorry, but these things make me laugh. They are cute and collect dust real well sitting in the corner, which is where they usually end up.

Keep up the great work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Trevor<br />
Let me start by saying that it&#8217;s been great listening to you on the New Media Photographer podcast</p>
<p>I know they are billing this Photographer-in-a-Box systems like as a first of it.s kind but these have bee around for some time now. Although this one does have a turntable.</p>
<p>These are good when an exec needs to show a damaged bolt or something to a supplier half way across the planet but other then that they are quite useless. The shooting area is WAY to small for anything much bigger then a pack of smokes.</p>
<p>I also like how they don&#8217;t list how much it costs. I would render to guess it goes for anywhere from $2,000 to $4,000</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but these things make me laugh. They are cute and collect dust real well sitting in the corner, which is where they usually end up.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

